top of page

Finding Quick-Wins Using Enterprise Architecture

Value–Effort Matrix Project Selection.png

by Daniel Lambert (book a 30-minute meeting)

​

While examining projects, it's tempting for enterprise architects to focus on major, complicated initiatives. However, pursuing quick wins is often a safer and more effective approach. Major projects frequently face delays, budget overruns, and often fail to achieve their initial business objectives. In the complex and rapidly evolving landscape of enterprise management, identifying opportunities that yield quick wins is a strategic imperative. These projects can deliver immediate value with minimal effort and resources, catalyzing broader organizational improvements. Enterprise architecture offers a powerful framework for pinpointing these opportunities, enabling organizations to align their initiatives with business objectives, optimize resource utilization, and enhance overall efficiency.

​

Finding Quick-Wins Projects

​

Project prioritization is critical for program managers, enterprise architects, and other business stakeholders within an organization’s planning ecosystem. Effectively prioritizing projects helps identify quick-wins opportunities that can be addressed with minimal effort for maximum gain. Before allocating resources, organizations can categorize their project requests into four groups, as illustrated in Figure 1 below:

​

  1. Quick-Wins Projects: These projects require low to moderate effort and provide high value. They should be prioritized as they offer quick wins with minimal investment.

  2. Major Initiatives: These projects demand significant effort but also promise high value. All relevant IT and business stakeholders must be aligned before selection to ensure success.

  3. Easy-to-Do and No-Value Projects: Projects that require minimal effort but do not generate substantial value should generally be deprioritized in favor of more impactful initiatives.

  4. Cash-Drain Projects: These projects require substantial resources but do not provide adequate value. Such projects should be avoided, allowing the organization to focus on quick-wins projects and major initiatives that offer better returns.

​

By focusing on quick-wins projects and major initiatives (once key stakeholders are aligned), organizations can optimize resource allocation, maximize value creation, and avoid unnecessary expenditures on low-impact projects.

Figure 1 - Value–Effort Matrix Project Selection  .png

Understanding Quick Wins in an Enterprise Context

​

Quick wins in an enterprise context refer to projects that can be quickly implemented to deliver measurable benefits without significant investment or risk. These projects are typically characterized by their simplicity, clear scope, and high potential for return on investment. They often involve adding incremental revenue-generating services, enhancing communication channels, deploying small-scale technological solutions, eliminating application duplication supporting the same capability, data cleanup and standardization, and optimizing existing processes, among others, as shown in Figure 2 below.

​

Identifying these opportunities requires a thorough understanding of your organization's current state, including its capabilities, processes, systems, and data flows. This is where enterprise architecture comes into play. enterprise architecture provides a holistic view of the enterprise, mapping out its business capabilities, business processes, data assets, information systems, and technology infrastructure. By leveraging EA, organizations can systematically assess their capabilities and identify areas ripe for improvement.

Figure 2 – Twenty Quick-Wins Examples for Enterprise Architects.png

The Role of Enterprise Architecture in Identifying Quick-Wins Projects

​

The role of enterprise architects is crucial to identify quick-wins projects through any of these six methodologies: strategic alignments, value creation, process optimization, technology rationalization, data management optimization, and efficiency gains.

​

1. Strategic Alignment: enterprise architecture ensures that all initiatives and projects, including quick wins, align with the organization's strategic goals and objectives. By maintaining a clear view of the enterprise's goals, enterprise architecture helps prioritize projects that support these goals and objectives, ensuring that resources are directed towards initiatives that deliver the most value.

​

2. Value Creation: There are two primary ways for your initiatives and projects to add value to your organization: through revenue growth and/or cost reductions. Here, we will focus on revenue growth, as the methodologies below are more oriented toward cost reduction. To quickly identify revenue-generating quick-wins projects, consider elaborating on and examining value propositions delivered through client-driven value streams, as depicted in Figure 3. By analyzing these value streams, you can identify untapped opportunities. First, review the participating stakeholders in a value stream to identify any potential contributors who have not been fully utilized. Next, assess the enabling capabilities of the value stream. This process allows enterprise architects to pinpoint missing capabilities and corresponding supporting applications or microservices. Finally, examine the required information for the value stream to identify any missing information types that could enhance the value proposition. By addressing these gaps, organizations can unlock new revenue opportunities and optimize their value delivery processes.

Figure 3- Value Creation with Enterprise Architecture.png

3. Process Optimization: One of the primary benefits of enterprise architecture is its ability to model and analyze business processes. By examining these processes, an enterprise architect can identify inefficiencies, redundancies, or bottlenecks that can be addressed quickly. For instance, automating manual data entry tasks or streamlining communication protocols using artificial intelligence can be low-cost projects with immediate benefits.​

​

4, Technology Rationalization: Organizations often accumulate a myriad of technologies over time, leading to a complex and costly IT landscape. Traditionally, enterprise architects have been good at helping the rationalization of these technologies by identifying redundant systems or underutilized applications using business capabilities. Decommissioning outdated systems or consolidating similar functions into a single platform can significantly reduce costs and complexity.

 

5. Data Management Optimization: Data is a critical asset for any organization, yet many struggle with data silos and inconsistencies. Enterprise architecture provides a framework for better data governance and integration. Quick wins in this area might include developing a centralized data repository, improving data quality, or implementing basic data analytics to inform decision-making.

 

6. Efficiency Gains: Through a detailed understanding of the enterprise's components and their interactions, enterprise architecture can identify areas where cost reductions are feasible. This might involve renegotiating vendor contracts, optimizing supply chain logistics, or reducing energy consumption through more efficient technologies.

​

Implementing Quick-Wins Projects

​

Once identified, implementing quick-wins projects involves careful planning and execution. It is essential to establish clear objectives, define success criteria, and ensure stakeholder buy-in. Given the simplicity of these projects, they typically require shorter timelines and fewer resources, making them ideal for rapid deployment.

For example, a company may identify that its approval processes are overly complicated and time-consuming. By using enterprise architecture to map out the current workflow, the organization can redesign this process to eliminate unnecessary steps, implement electronic signatures, and automate notifications. The result is a faster, more efficient process that saves time and reduces frustration for employees and customers alike.

​

Another example could involve enhancing the organization's internal communication tools. If enterprise architects identify that different departments are using various communication platforms, leading to miscommunication and delays, a quick win could be the implementation of a unified communication platform. This solution could streamline information sharing, improve collaboration, and enhance overall productivity.

​

Assessing the Impact and Preparing for Broader Initiatives

​

After implementing quick-wins projects, it is crucial to assess their impact and performance. Metrics such as cost savings, time reduction, and customer and user satisfaction should be measured against the established success criteria. This evaluation not only validates the project's success but also provides insights into the organization's readiness for more significant major initiatives, as described in Figure 1 above.

​

Successful quick-wins projects build momentum and demonstrate the value of continuous improvement. They also help establish a culture of agility and responsiveness, laying the groundwork for more substantial, transformative projects. By leveraging the insights gained from these quick wins, organizations can embark on more ambitious endeavors with greater confidence and preparedness.

​

Conclusion

​

Enterprise architecture is a vital practice for identifying and delivering quick-wins projects. By providing a comprehensive view of the organization's architecture, enterprise architecture enables strategic alignment, value creation, process optimization, data management optimization, and technology rationalization. These small-scale projects deliver quick, tangible benefits, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and setting the stage for more substantial organizational changes. As businesses navigate an increasingly complex and competitive landscape, leveraging enterprise architecture to find and implement quick wins can be a key driver of sustained success and growth.

bottom of page